D. Altmaier
To Win
D. E. Galan
To Win
Jack Sock vs Daniel Altmaier Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L W L L L
Form
L L W W W W L W L WHead-To-Head: Sock 1 - 1 Altmaier
They have played 6 sets in total, with Sock winning 3 and Altmaier winning 3. The last match between Sock and Altmaier was at the Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach, 15-02-2022, First, Hard with Jack Sock getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jack Sock | 1 |
| Daniel Altmaier | 1 |
Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach(15-02-2022)
2
6
6
3
6
4
| Sock | Stats | Altmaier |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (16-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 808 | Ranking | 67 |
| 8 | Highest Rank | 47 |
| 32 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 16 |
| 56% (322-248) | Career Total W/L | 60% (406-270) |
| $4,932,130 | Career Prize Money | $1,706,585 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Avanesyan VS Dolehide PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Jack Sock
Player
Daniel Altmaier
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 7-6(2) |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Jack Sock
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
92%
(
46 of
50)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
48 of
62)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
14%
(
11 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
33 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 31 | Games Won | 30 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:10:41 | Average Match Time | 2:10:41 |
| 59% (109/184) | 1st Serve % | 69% (109/159) |
| 73% (80/109) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (82/109) |
| 56% (42/75) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (32/50) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 28% (45/159) | Return Points Win % | 34% (62/184) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jack Sock Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Jack Sock
62%
(
74 of
119)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Jack Sock
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Jack Sock
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Sock
Player
Gregoire Barrere
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Jack Sock
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
10
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Sock
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Sock
Player
Ilya Ivashka
56%
(
75 of
133)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
101)
9
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
3
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
38%
(
22 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
41%
(
55 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Jack Sock
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Jack Sock
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Jack Sock
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
39 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Altmaier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Luca Van Assche
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Daniel Altmaier
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Daniel Altmaier
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Richard Gasquet
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
37%
(
18 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
53%
(
52 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Daniel Altmaier
60%
(
56 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
112)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (322/248) | Win/Loss | 60% (406/270) |
| 55% (797/646) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (911/659) |
| 51% (7296/6916) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7921/7075) |
| 53% (149/133) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (131/84) |
| 62% (79/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (201/128) |
| 58% (66/48) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (66/44) |
| 60% (28/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (8/14) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.47 |
| 3267 | Aces Total | 3479 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2085 | Total Double Faults | 1257 |
| 1:32:52 | Average Match Time | 1:30:47 |
| 520.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 403.44 |
| 59% (23259/39740) | 1st Serve % | 61% (25457/41432) |
| 74% (17171/23259) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (18220/25457) |
| 52% (8630/16476) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8014/15975) |
| 39% (1262/3212) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1708/4050) |
| 36% (14115/39678) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16408/41848) |
| 55% (41/34) | Slam W/L | 46% (13/15) |
| 53% (59/53) | Masters W/L | 47% (22/25) |
| 48% (10/11) | Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 57% (102/78) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (51/74) |
| 50% (2/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (77/53) | Challenger W/L | 66% (138/71) |
| 66% (31/16) | Futures W/L | 68% (180/83) |
| 57% (278/484) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (389/635) |
| 49% (36/74) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 42% (11/26) |
| 53% (148/279) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (138/244) |
| 51% (104/205) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (108/193) |
| 80% (330/265) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (397/353) |
| 19% (330/63) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (397/44) |
| 23% (240/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (279/53) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
